ЛИДЕРСТВО В КРИЗИСНЫХ СИТУАЦИЯХ: ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ ЛИДЕРОВ И ИННОВАЦИИ |
| научная статья | |||
| 106-114 | характеристики лидеров, COVID-19, кризисы, теории хаоса и сложности, теория активизации черт, жизнеспособность, инновации, антикризисное управление |
| Рассматривается критическая роль лидерства во время кризиса COVID-19. В центре внимания статьи, как характеристики лидеров определяют их способность содействовать адаптивности и инновациям во время кризисов. На основе теории активизации черт исследуется, как лидеры черпают знания из преодоления кризисных ситуаций и проявляют поведение, способствующее жизнеспособности организации и инновациям. Используются теории хаоса и сложности, которые пытаются объяснить непредсказуемую и динамичную природу организационных систем и их чувствительность к кризисам. Интегрируя эти две теоретические основы, авторы определяют черты лидерства - гибкость, креативность, предпринимательский склад ума и склонность к риску - как важнейшие для руководства организацией в сложной и изменчивой среде и способствующие выживанию и производительности организации в условиях кризиса. Предложена точка зрения, что главное в лидерстве в условиях кризиса - это гибкость. |
 |
| 1 . Choudhuri S. COVID-19 overview of impact on the global economy and steps or suggestions to combat the scenario // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2020. V. 6. P. 1-6. 2 . Shpringer A.S. Human resource management in times of crises 2008-2009 and 2020-2021: Comparative analysis // Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management. 2021. V. 20. № 3. P. 371-390. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2021.304. 3 . Захарова Л.Н., Леонова И.С., Коробейникова Е.В. Ценностный конфликт и психологическая жизнеспособность персонала российских предприятий. Нижний Новгород: Национальный исследовательский Нижегородский государственный университет им. Н.И. Лобачевского. 2017. 411 с. 4 . Bessant J., Rush H., Trifilova A. Crisis-driven innovation: the case of humanitarian innovation // International Journal of Innovation Management. 2015. V. 19. № 6. P. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919615400149. 5 . Sultanova A.V., Chechina O.S. Human capital as a key factor of economic growth in crisis // European Research Studies Journal. 2016. V. XIX. № 2. P. 71-78. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/522. 6 . Soto-Acosta P. COVID-19 pandemic: Shifting digital transformation to a high-speed gear // Information Systems Management. 2020. V. 37. № 4. P. 260-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1814461. 7 . Nagel L. The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the digital transformation of work // International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 2020. V. 40. № 9/10. P. 861-875. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0323. 8 . Pekhtereva E. The issue of leadership and management in times of pandemic crisis // Economic and Social Problems of Russia: The Digital Economy - Current State and Prospects. 2020. V. 3. P. 102-113. https://doi.org/10.31249/espr/2020.03.05. 9 . Biron M., et al. Structuring for innovative responses to human resource challenges: A skunk works approach // Human Resource Management Review. 2021. V. 31. № 2. P. 100768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100768. 10 . Juergensen J., Guim?n J., Narula R. European SMEs amidst the COVID-19 crisis: Assessing impact and policy responses // Journal of Industrial and Business Economics. 2020. V. 47. № 3. P. 499-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-020-00169-4. 11 . Cankurtaran P., Beverland M.B. Using design thinking to respond to crises: B2B lessons from the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic // Industrial Marketing Management. 2020. V. 88. P. 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.030. 12 . Terziev V. Strategicheskoe upravlenie v usloviyakh global'nogo krizisa [Strategic management in times of global crisis]. Preprint from SSRN, 26 Apr. 2022. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4066778. 13 . Fedorova A., Menshikova M., Dvorakova Z. Toxic human factor of crisis situations within the Russian organizations // Journal of Human Resource Management. 2013. V. 3. P. 29-36. 14 . Tett R.P., Burnett D.B. A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003. V. 88. P. 500-517. 15 . Tett R.P., Simonet D.V., Walser B., Brown C. Trait activation theory: Applications, further developments, and implications for workplace fit // Handbook of Personality at Work. Christiansen N.D., Tett R.P. (Eds.). 2013. P. 71-100. 16 . Morel B., Ramanujam R. Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems // Organization Science. 1999. V. 10. P. 278-293. 17 . Lewis R. From chaos to complexity: Implications for organizations // Executive Development. 1994. V. 7. P. 16-17. 18 . Volkodavova E.V., Pavlova O.P., Zhabin A.P., Tomazova O.V. Management of strategic organisational changes in Russian companies under modern economic conditions // E3S Web of Conferences. 2023. V. 420. Article 04004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342004004. 19 . Levy D. Chaos theory and strategy: Theory, application, and managerial implications // Strategic Management Journal. 1994. V. 15. № S2. P. 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250151011. 20 . Eisenhardt K.M., Piezunka H.Complexity theory and corporate strategy // The Sage Handbook of Complexity and Management. SAGE Publications Ltd., 2011. P. 506-523. 21 . Davis J.P., Eisenhardt K.M., Bingham C.B. Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules // Administrative Science Quarterly. 2009. V. 54. № 3. P. 413-452. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413. 22 . Peters T. A world turned upside down // The Academy of Management Executive (1987-1989). 1987. V. 1. № 3. P. 231-241. 23 . Muduli A. Workforce agility: A review of literature // International Journal of Management and Business Research. 2013. V. 3. № 1. P. 53-63. 24 . Gromova E.A. Agile management in the context of the Russian industrial sector // MATEC Web Conf. 2018. V. 178. Article 08007. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817808007. 25 . Luria G., Kahana A., Goldenberg J., Noam Y. Contextual moderators for leadership potential based on trait activation theory // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2019. V. 40. № 8. P. 899-911. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2373. 26 . Emmaly S. Emotion and cognitive strategy as predictors of workplace incivility. Master’s thesis. Western Illinois University, 2016. 27 . Jiyoung W. Effects of expressing emotion and altering loco color in organizational crisis responses. Master’s thesis. University of Missouri-Columbia, 2017. 28 . Han S., Lerner J.S., Keltner D. Feelings and consumer decision making: The appraisal-tendency framework // Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2007. V. 17. № 3. P. 158-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70023-2. 29 . Karen P. The influence of servant leadership and emotional intelligence on employee engagement. Master’s thesis. Pepperdine University, 2015. 30 . Lowman R.L. Transforming crises into opportunities // The Psychologist-Manager Journal. 2001. V. 5. № 1. P. 75-77. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095902. 31 . Al-Alawi A.I., Messaadia M., Mehrotra A. et al. Digital transformation adoption in human resources management during COVID-19 // Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research. 2023. V. 41. № 4. P. 446-461. https://doi.org/10.1108/AGJSR-05-2022-0069 32 . Дьяков С.А., Абрамян М.Н., Колесникова Д.А., Шабатура Е.Р. Основы антикризисного управления в малом бизнесе в условиях кризиса, вызванного пандемией COVID-19 [Fundamentals of crisis management in small business during the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic] // Естественно-гуманитарные исследования. 2022. № 39. P. 134-140. 33 . Kuckertz A. et al. Startups in times of crisis - A rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic // Journal of Business Venturing Insights. 2020. V. 13. P. 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00169. 34 . Doern R. Entrepreneurship and crisis management: The experiences of small businesses during the London 2011 riots // International Small Business Journal: Research and Entrepreneurship. 2016. V. 34. № 3. P. 276-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614553863. 35 . Doern R., Williams N., Vorley T. Special issue on entrepreneurship and crises: business as usual? An introduction and review of the literature // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2019. V. 43. № 5. P. 953-962. 36 . Dahlke J. et al. Crisis-driven innovation and fundamental human needs: A typological framework of rapid-response COVID-19 innovations // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021. V. 169. Article 120799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120799. 37 . Kraus S. et al. The economics of COVID-19: Initial empirical evidence on how family firms in five European countries cope with the corona crisis // International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2020. V. 26. № 5. P. 1067-1092. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2020-0214. 38 . Kuratko D.F., Fisher G., Audretsch D.B. Unraveling the entrepreneurial mindset // Small Business Economics. 2021. V. 57. P. 1681-1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00372-6. 39 . Cater III J.J., Young M., Hua L. Examining the entrepreneurial mindset and entrepreneurial intentions // Journal of Applied Business and Economics. 2023. V. 25. № 4. https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v25i4.6339. 40 . Wang W., Zhao J., Zhang W., Wang Y. Conceptual framework for risk propensity, risk perception, and risk behaviour of construction project managers // In: Raiden A.B., Aboague-Nimo E. (Eds.) Procs 31 Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 Sept 2015. P. 165-174. 41 . Highhouse S., Wang Y., Zhang D.C. Is risk propensity unique from the big five factors of personality? A meta-analytic investigation // Journal of Research in Personality. 2022. V. 98. Article 104206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104206. 42 . Duchek S. Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization // Business Research. 2020. V. 13. P. 215-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7. 43 . Andersson T., C?ker M., Tengblad S., Wick-elgren M. Building traits for organizational resilience through balancing organizational structures // Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2019. V. 35. P. 36-45. 44 . Marcus A.A., Nichols M.L. On the edge: Heeding the warnings of unusual events // Organization Science. 1999. V. 10. P. 482-499. 45 . Lampel J., Shapira Z. Judgmental errors, interactive norms, and the difficulty of detecting strategic surprises // Organization Science. 2001. V. 12. P. 599-611. 46 . Starbuck W.H. Cognitive reactions to rare events: Perceptions, uncertainty, and learning // Organization Science. 2009. V. 20. P. 925-937. 47 . Bechky B.A., Okhuysen G. Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises // Academy of Management Journal. 2011. V. 54. P. 239-261. 48 . Saad M.H., Hagelaar G., van der Velde G., Omta S.W.F. Conceptualization of SMEs’ business resilience: A systematic literature review // Cogent Business & Management. 2021. V. 8. № 1. Article 1938347. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1938347. 49 . Linnenluecke M.K. Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda // International Journal of Management Reviews. 2017. V. 19. P. 4-30. 50 . Prieto L., Talukder M.F. Resilient agility: A necessary condition for employee and organizational sustainability // Sustainability. 2023. V. 15. № 2. Article https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021552. 51 . Joiner B. Leadership agility for organizational agility // Journal of Creating Value. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/239496431986321. |